|
|
AIC
UPDATE - October
2006 | Vol. 3 | No. 51
|
|
More than 65,000 people receive AIC Update. It
is one of the best ways to communicate your views
or advertise your business and organization. We will
also reciprocate non-commercial ads.
|
| Perils and Promises of US-Iran Relations - Hooshang Amirahmadi |
 |
For over a quarter of century, the US and Iran have
been hostile towards each other. The problem began
with the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran and the
subsequent taking of American hostages in Tehran.
Even before the Revolution, many Iranians were
bitter toward the US for helping the British to
overthrow their democratically elected Prime Minster
Mohammad Mosadeq in 1953, and to support Shah
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the dictator whom the
Revolution overthrew. The bitterness that ensued
turned into a fierce anti-Americanism during the
Revolution and precipitated the storming of the
American Embassy in Tehran by young Islamic
radicals. Although the hostages were released
unharmed after 444 days in captivity, this episode
has created a negative ripple effect that continues
today. From two friends and partners, the US and
Iran have become two enemies, harming and
demonizing each other ever since...
|
| “Opening the Dialogue” Presented by Kayvon Afshari |
 |
This past weekend “Opening the Dialogue”, a series
of lectures hosted at the home of Dr. Mohammad and
Akhtar Afshari, was attended by approximately sixty
invitees. The event was the end result of a summer
research project undertaken by AIC intern, Kayvon
Afshari. His research project aimed to survey the
Iranian-American community with regard to their
views on the US-Iran relationship through a
questionnaire, to fundraise money for the project as
well as for the AIC, and to organize this weekend’s
conference to present the findings from the survey.
The event included a welcoming statement by Dr.
Afshari followed by speeches from Kayvon Afshari,
AIC Founder and President Dr. Hooshang Amirahmadi,
and Dr. Maboud Ansari, Professor of Sociology at
William Patterson University. Kayvon Afshari’s
speech, entitled A Natural Bridge to Surpass the
Tides of Hateful Rhetoric:
Uncertainty in the US-Iran Relationship and the
Potential for Iranian-Americans to Reclaim to Human
Agency, was based on the results of the
questionnaires and focused on the impact that
uncertainty in the relationship has on the ability of
single, self-contained events to have a huge
overall “tipping” effect. Afshari’s thesis was that the
uncertainty in the relationship and the fact that no
leader or group in Iran or the US knows what the
outcome in the foreseeable future will be, multiplies
the ability of single events to impact the relationship
in the absence of strong external forces such as
economic incentives.
Examples cited included President Ahmadinejad’s
statements on the state of Israel, President Bush’s
condemnations of Iran as part of the “axis of evil”, as
well as more conciliatory single events such as
candlelit vigils taking place in the streets of Iran to
mourn the victims of September 11th and former
State Secretary Madeline Albright’s acknowledgement
at an AIC event of the US role in Operation Ajax.
Kayvon Afshari also argued that because of its
duality of allegiance, the Iranian-American community
should be a prime candidate for serving as an honest
broker between the two nations, and that therefore
the analysis, aspirations, suggestions, and demands
of this community should be taken very seriously.
This argument was based on the results of the
survey which demonstrated that a duality of
allegiance exists within this group.
|
| Iran: Relations with the Unite States and Prospects for Democracy - A Lecture in Berkeley |
 |
|
Professor Amirahmadi (www.amirahmadi.
com) will be
speaking at the University of California, Berkeley, on
5 October 2006 at 6 pm. The event will take place in
the Maude Fife Room at 315 Wheeler Hall.
His lecture title is, “Iran: Relations with the Unite
States and Prospects for Democracy.” The event is
organized by the Religion, Politics, and Globalization
Program, cosponsored by the Center for Middle
Eastern Studies and IAS at Berkeley.
Please click on the picture to see the details.
|
| This Issue’s Selected Articles |
 |
|
Subject: Exclusive Interview -- Iran's Foreign
Minister, M. Mottaki
In this exclusive interview, Iran's foreign minister,
Monouchehr Mottaki, speaks frankly about Iran's
foreign policy priorities, strategic partners, and
regional security concerns. He reaffirms Iran's role in
working for the security of the entire Persian Gulf,
and dismisses the possibility of a U.S. attack on
Iran.
-------------------
Advisory Release: 27 September 2006
-------------------
Iran¹s Foreign Minister, Manouchehr Mottaki
interview by Kaveh L. Afrasiabi
Kaveh Afrasiabi: What are the main
foreign policy priorities of Iran today?
Foreign Minister M. Mottaki: Our
priority is to protect our rights and interests. We are
also concerned with the lack of justice and
spirituality in the current international system. Sixty
years after the establishment of the United Nations,
we are still confronted with a great deal of injustice,
with some powers playing big brother. This is the
reason for unilateralism today, which is no longer
acceptable by most of the world community
supporting multilateralism. The absence of spirituality
has translated into power without responsibility, that
is, every party trying to acquire power without a
sense of responsibility to the human beings and
members of the international community. This lack
of justice and spiritual standards has translated into
various crises around the world. If you look at the
recent war in Lebanon, you will find a glaring example
of this unjust approach, with some parties preventing
an immediate cease fire and supporting the
aggression of the Zionist regime.
Afrasiabi: Who are Iran¹s key
strategic and trading partners in the world today?
Mottaki: We have so many partners
in the world today. In Asia, we have very good
relations with China, Japan, India, Malaysia and
others, both economically and politically. We have a
lot of friends with common interests and common
concerns dealing with international issues. With
Europe, we have traditionally had good relations for
many years -- with Italy, Germany, France, and
these days, with Spain. They are our main partners
in economic relations as well as for political
negotiations. In Latin America and Africa, we have a
new policy to enhance our relations. We have very
good relations with Latin America in the area of
economic relations, political consultation and cultural
dialogue. We have solid relations in Africa, but
unfortunately certain powers are trying to deceive
the minds of others, trying to spread a negative
image of others in order to discourage our relations
with other countries in Africa for the sake of their
own interests. With Russia, we have very good
relations. With the Muslim countries, we have
common concerns, especially now that Islam is under
attack in the West, as can be seen with the
cartoons and some recent statements on our
prophets, and the false characterizations of Islam as
fascist. These really reflect more on their own
intolerant behavior, which creates fascism in the
world.
Afrasiabi: With respect to the Persian
Gulf states which are members of the Gulf
Cooperation Council, what are the prospects for
improved relations with Iran?
Mottaki: We have very good relations
with the Persian Gulf states. We consider our
relations with them as highly important. This region
provides some 62% of the world¹s energy needs,
which makes the issue of security very important.
We must consider the security of the Persian Gulf as
a whole. We cannot divide the region¹s security
interests, and expect to see tension in one part while
the rest of Persian Gulf is secure. Regional
cooperation among the littoral states of the Persian
Gulf is one of the best ways to promote security.
With Iran and the new Iraq we can establish a new
basis for common Persian Gulf security.
Afrasiabi: What concrete steps has
Iran taken to promote regional cooperation?
Mottaki: Well, for one thing, Iran is a
member of the Economic Cooperation Organization
(ECO), which was initially established along with
Turkey and Pakistan. After the revolution, the
mandate and composition of this organization
changed, focusing on economic cooperation. ECO has
seven new members, including six republics from the
former Soviet Union, plus Afghanistan. Last year, we
had an ECO ministerial meeting in Kazakhstan, and
we adopted a plan of action for the next ten years.
We focused on expansion of trade in the ECO bloc,
enhancement of our banking systems, capacity
building, and transportation. We have also set up a
follow-up system, with specific countries responsible
to follow-up on the implementation of decisions. We
are hoping that by coordinating tariffs among the
member states, we can increase ECO¹s role in
regional economic activities.
Another issue is the connection between the
Persian Gulf states and Central Asia and other
republics of the former Soviet Union. I recently
raised this with Persian Gulf leaders. Iran is the most
feasible transport option for goods from Persian Gulf
to Central Asia and the Caucasus. And last but not
least is the issue of energy transport. Iran is the
most secure channel for transferring Central Asian
energy through the Persian Gulf. We now move more
than 370,000 barrels of oil per day from Central Asia
to Persian Gulf through Iran. There is a rich potential
for cooperation among the states in the region.
Afrasiabi: Iran has recently offered
to help with Iraq¹s security problems. Can you
elaborate on this?
Mottaki: Iraq has two main
problems. First, the lack of security and terrorist
activities; and second, the continuing presence of
foreign troops. We believe the best option is to
leave Iraq¹s security to Iraqi officials, and we favor a
timetable for the withdrawal of foreign forces. We
support the process of government-making in Iraq.
Security is not just vital for Iraq, but for the region
and its neighbors as well. That is why we are willing
to assist the Iraqi government.
Afrasiabi: Does Iran take the U.S.
threats of military action against Iran seriously? What
would be Iran¹s response?
Mottaki: We do not see the
Americans initiating yet another crisis against the
interests of their own taxpayers. With what they
have done in the past ¬ and they are grappling with
many problems ¬ it is better for them to focus on
resolving their present crises. Iran is a country that
can strongly defend itself, and our history shows
that our people never submit to the dictates of other
countries. No, we do not see the Americans taking
any such actions.
Kaveh L. Afrasiabi, Ph.D. is a political scientist and
author who specializes on Iran's foreign and nuclear
affairs.
Copyright © 2006 Kaveh L. Afrasiabi / Agence
Global
---------------
Released: 27 September 2006
Word Count: 993
Selected links:
Iranian airplanes and the United States – BBC (in
Persian)
http://www.bbc.net.uk/persian/ira
n/story/2006/10/061003_si-wmt-usa-
iranianplane.shtml
On Ahmadinejad's discussion at the Council on
Foreign Affairs (in Persian)
http://www.donya-e-
eqtesad.com/Default_view.asp?@=12370
Iranian-born artist Shirin Neshat has won the 2006
Dorothy and Lillian Gish Prize
http://www.
irandokht.com/editorial/index4.php?
area=pro§ionID=8&editorialID=2147
Door to Iranian dialogue creaks open
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Pa
ge/HI21Aa02.html
|
| AIC Encourages You to Write, Translate and Distribute |
 |
If you are interested in translating any of the original
articles that
are published in the AIC Updates, you may do so
without prior
permission as long as the AIC Update is cited as the
original source
and the article is referenced properly and fully. In
fact, we
encourage you to translate and distribute our original
writings!
You may publish them in the medium of your choice
or we will be
pleased to publish your translations in AIC Update.
|
| About Us |
 |
Vision
The vision of the American Iranian Council is that the
United States and Iran will work together, since their
common interests far outweigh their differences. AIC
also envisions the Iranian-American community
playing an increasingly significant role in American
society, and Iran becoming a democratically
developed member of the global community with full
respect for human rights.
|
Mission
The mission of AIC is to be a constructive force, in
cooperation and partnership with other organizations,
in bringing the United States and Iran together,
involving the Iranian-American community in the
dialogue, and bringing attention to social and political
conditions in Iran.
|
Goals The three
interrelated goals of the American Iranian Council
are:
1.
To serve as a platform for sustained dialogue on U.S.-
Iran relations.
2. To serve as a catalyst to educate all Americans,
including Iranian-Americans, regarding this
dialogue.
3. To serve as a forum for discussion of issues of
importance in Iranian society.
|
Copyright © 2005 American Iranian Council. All
rights reserved.
American Iranian Council | 20 Nassau Street, Suite
111 | Princeton | NJ | 08542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WE WORK FOR PEACE BETWEEN THE UNITED
STATES AND IRAN AND DESERVE YOUR
SUPPORT
To help sustain AIC Update, please write a Check or
Money Order to "American Iranian Council" and send
your contribution to:
American Iranian Council
20 Nassau Street, Suite 111
Princeton, NJ 08542
We also accept Visa, MasterCard,
American Express, and Discover. Please forward Card
Owner Name and Address, Card Number, Expiration
Date, and Amount, and send card
information through:
- Above Address
- Fax at: 609 252 9698
- Phone at: 609 252 9099
|
|