|
|
AIC
UPDATE - August
2006 | Vol. 3 | No. 49
|
|
More than 65,000 people receive AIC Update. It
is one of the best ways to communicate your views
or advertise your business and organization. We will
also reciprocate non-commercial ads.
|
| Highlights from the Nuclear News |
 |
On 22 August 2006, Iran submitted its long-awaited
response to the proposal from the five permanent
members of the UN Security Council plus Germany to
their respective Ambassadors in a collective meeting
in Tehran. Details of the response remains unknown
though highlights suggest that it contains elements
that will sure come as disappointment to the EU and
the US a well as ideas that will help a negotiated
settlement. Significantly, Iran’s response seems to
reject the suspension of uranium enrichment as a
precondition for opening negotiations on the nuclear
dispute; it does, however, accept to negotiate such
suspension. This is of course radically different from
the position Iran had so far assumed. Specifically,
Iran had long maintained that its uranium enrichment
programs are not negotiable as that is its unalienable
rights as per the NPT.
We, at the American Iranian Council, believe that
now that Iran is willing to negotiate suspension, the
US must take Tehran to challenge and make moves
that will facilitate such negotiations. It is also our
believe that on the negotiation table, the US must
put, publicly, a huge pile of carrots for Iran to
consider and the incentive package must be big
enough to invite the unconditional support of the
Iranian people. The US must also place on the table,
but initially covered, a huge pile of stick so that Iran
will be forced to make a choice. It is almost certain
that Iran will take the incentive package as
otherwise it would have to face the angers of the
Iranian people. Let us hope that the US and Iran at
last find it imperative to negotiate in good faith and
for the benefit of the two great nations and the rest
of the world.
Tuesday, August 22, 2006: Iran formally
responded
to a proposal from the P5+1 (Britain, China, France,
Russia, United States, and Germany) seeking to
resolve the dispute over the country's nuclear
program. Iran describes the contents of its response
as “positive and clear signals” to resolve the dispute
over its nuclear program. The Islamic Republic could
face U.N. sanctions unless it reverses course and
agrees to a verifiable halt to enrichment activities
that can be a precursor to the manufacture of
nuclear weapons. (Source: Associated Press)
Iranian warships opened fire and seized a Romanian
oil rig near Kish island in the Persian Gulf. The crew of
27 was held for several hours on the rig's heliport
before being freed. Prior to the attack, an Iranian
court had ordered the rig to remain in Iranian waters
pending resolution of a legal dispute. Iran has not
commented on the incident. (Source: Associated
Press)
Wednesday, August 23, 2006: Gonzalo
Gallegos, a
spokesman for the US State Department, said
America was consulting its allies on the next steps to
take in confronting Iran, but observed that Tehran
had not addressed the central UN demand: that it
stop enriching uranium, the first stage towards
developing atomic weapons. "We acknowledge that
Iran considers its response as a serious offer, and we
will review it," said Gonzalo Gallegos, the
spokesman. “The response, however, falls short of
the conditions set by the Security Council, which
require the full and verifiable suspension of all
enrichment-related and reprocessing activities.”
(Source: Times Online)
The House intelligence committee released a report
declaring that "the United States lacks critical
information needed for analysts to make many of
their judgments with confidence about Iran and there
are many significant information gaps." The report
recommends several steps including increasing the
number of spies who know relevant languages and
improving analysis, intelligence sharing and human
spy placement. Such criticism, especially in light of
America's intelligence failures in Iraq, may further
dissuade US policymakers from taking military action
against Iran if the diplomatic track proves unfruitful.
(Source: Time Magazine)
Thursday, August 23, 2006: A high-ranking
defense
official told The Jerusalem Post that there is growing
consensus within the Israeli defense establishment
that the United States will not attack Iran, and that
Israel might be forced to act independently to stop
the Islamic republic from obtaining nuclear weapons.
The defense official blasted the US for “not doing
enough” to stop Teheran's race to the bomb.
(Source: The Jerusalem Post)
In an interview with Germany's N24 television,
German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that Iran’s
response was not satisfactory. “From everything I
hear, we cannot be satisfied with it. What we
expected is not stated there, namely ‘we will
suspend our uranium enrichment and come to the
negotiating table’.” Previously, Iran's President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had written Merkel a letter
stating that their two countries had been subjected
to "tyranny" from the World War Two victors and
should cooperate to end the "imposed" world order.
The Iranian president did not repeat his previous
assertion that the Holocaust was a myth. He did,
however, say it had been used to weaken Germany,
and he railed against Zionism (Source: Reuters)
|
| A letter from an Evacuee - Paola Rizzuto |
 |
|
“So are you going back?”
Asked my aunt with a voice that bristled with worry.
We had not spoken since war had curtailed my
summer vacation and imprinted my psyche with
wholly new definitions of outrage. Without a second
thought I said “Yes, I’ll go back to Lebanon as soon
as I possibly can.” My aunt, like several other family
members, were worried to the point of insomnia as I
was curled up in front of a computer in Beirut
describing in detail events such as the destruction of
the country’s only international airport. They cannot
fathom why I would want to go back “there.” After
all, good first generation children go to law school;
they do not go to Beirut and run around during air
raids trying their luck with an amateur war journalist
gig. Questions were followed by yet more
questions: “but how did you sleep?” and the
ubiquitous “weren’t you terrified of ______ ? (fill in
the blank with your favorite “terrorist” organization,
the dark, kidnappings, etc. The post evacuation
debriefing continued for weeks.
To be quite honest, we had the dubious privilege of
experiencing the war from a bubble. My partner
Rafael and I spent nearly three weeks in Lebanon
shuttling ourselves between apartments at the
American University of Beirut and in Hamra. Although
we could hear the thud of explosions and the din of
the internally displaced people who had sought
refuge on our block, virtually nothing was destroyed
in our neighborhood. Food was available and we had
power and water pressure most of the time. Though
we experienced some hardships, they were trivial in
comparison to those in the Dahyeh whose houses
were being flattened by Israel’s death showers. They
were less than twelve miles away. In a nearby café
in Raouche, we watched an area near the airport
burn. Peering through our cheap binoculars, we were
just able to make out Israeli helicopters scurrying
away from the anti aircraft fire. One of the few
remaining Saudi tourists shouted “planes, planes!”
and asked Rafael if he could squint through them to
see for himself.
Yes, I want to go back to Lebanon and no, I am not
a madwoman. There is simply too much work that
needs to be done. Besides, Israel really meant it
when they said that “they would turn back the clock
in Lebanon by twenty years.” Although perhaps they
were being merciful; the UNDP said just turned the
clock back by a mere fifteen.
During the war, I was plagued with a unique
combination of intense anger and boredom. Fewer
and fewer restaurants cracked open their doors.
Entire neighborhoods were stripped of their usual
commotion, with their respective party scenes taking
an unheard of hiatus. Luckily, we had some friends
were in the process of putting together a relief
effort. The Lebanese government, which is
astonishingly efficient at doing absolutely nothing,
was characteristically slow to help the internally
displaced. Activists as well as community members
decided to take matters in their own hands. They
came out en masse in order to make life more
bearable for those who are in parks or schools. The
Samidoun network (www.samidoun.org) was one of
several organizations that was assembling teams that
could be dispatched to places where help was
needed. They also assembled an independent media
group, a medical team and a set of translators.
Throughout the war, Samidoun worked towards
providing direct assistance to those who were
displaced and providing the international community
with updates about the rapidly evolving conditions in
Lebanon. Thankfully, I was spared from the
inaccurate ramblings of reporters in the States who
were masquerading as honest journalists. As activists
ourselves, we immediately decided to stand in
solidarity with our comrades. We were inspired by
their resilience and just as irate. With their guidance,
we helped them disseminate information to the
international community. We wanted the world to
know that Israel was not, contrary to its press
releases, engaged in a surgically precise “war against
terror” or Hezbollah. What they were engaged in
was a war against civilians, children, infrastructure,
truth, economic viability, unity and the poor. Over
one hundred bridges were reduced to rubble. Over
seventy roads were cut. Nearly a quarter of the
population has been displaced. Even with the so-
called ceasefire in place, Lebanon is being strangled
by the Israeli Army’s air and sea blockade.
Like many of our Lebanese friends who held U.S.
documents, we were ambivalent about the
evacuation process. Many of us were plagued by an
odd sort of survivor’s guilt that made our stomachs
turn when we thought that our lives were now
considered to be more valuable because of a scrap of
paper. As we were melting in the hot sun for over
six hours while waiting to be packed into infernal
military transport vessels, we felt more like refugees
than evacuees. Or perhaps more precisely,
like “evacuees.” We were waiting in line with people
who had lost everything and endured the perilous
journey from the South, only to find themselves
passing through yet another dehumanizing level of
hell in order to flee.
I will go back to Beirut and Rafael probably will too.
There are buildings to be repaired, stories to be
shared and friends to be hugged.
Paola Rizzuto is a researcher at the Center for
Middle Eastern Studies, Rutgers, the State University
of New Jersey
|
| Anoosheh Ansari - The First Iranian Female Space Tourist |
 |
Anousheh Ansari is co-founder
CEO of Telecom Technologies, Inc. (TTI). She will
become the first Iranian (persian) in space and first
female space tourist in September 2006. Along with
her brother-in-law Amir Ansari, she made a multi-
million contribution to the X-Prize foundation on May
5, 2004, the 43rd anniversary of Alan Shepard's sub-
orbital spaceflight. The X-Prize was officially renamed
the Ansari X Prize in honour of their donation.
Born in 1967 in Tehran, Iran(persia), Ansari witnessed
the Iranian revolution in 1979. She emigrated to the
United States in 1984 at the age of sixteen and
received her bachelor's of science in electrical
engineering and computer science at George Mason
University. She received her master's degree at
George Washington University.
Anousheh Ansari
h
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anousheh_Ansari
|
| AIC Encourages You to Write, Translate and Distribute |
 |
If you are interested in translating any of the original
articles that
are published in the AIC Updates, you may do so
without prior
permission as long as the AIC Update is cited as the
original source
and the article is referenced properly and fully. In
fact, we
encourage you to translate and distribute our original
writings!
You may publish them in the medium of your choice
or we will be
pleased to publish your translations in AIC Update.
|
| About Us |
 |
Vision
The vision of the American Iranian Council is that the
United States and Iran will work together, since their
common interests far outweigh their differences. AIC
also envisions the Iranian-American community
playing an increasingly significant role in American
society, and Iran becoming a democratically
developed member of the global community with full
respect for human rights.
|
Mission
The mission of AIC is to be a constructive force, in
cooperation and partnership with other organizations,
in bringing the United States and Iran together,
involving the Iranian-American community in the
dialogue, and bringing attention to social and political
conditions in Iran.
|
Goals The three
interrelated goals of the American Iranian Council
are:
1.
To serve as a platform for sustained dialogue on U.S.-
Iran relations.
2. To serve as a catalyst to educate all Americans,
including Iranian-Americans, regarding this
dialogue.
3. To serve as a forum for discussion of issues of
importance in Iranian society.
|
Copyright © 2005 American Iranian Council. All
rights reserved.
American Iranian Council | 20 Nassau Street, Suite
111 | Princeton | NJ | 08542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WE WORK FOR PEACE BETWEEN THE UNITED
STATES AND IRAN AND DESERVE YOUR
SUPPORT
To help sustain AIC Update, please write a Check or
Money Order to "American Iranian Council" and send
your contribution to:
American Iranian Council
20 Nassau Street, Suite 111
Princeton, NJ 08542
We also accept Visa, MasterCard,
American Express, and Discover. Please forward Card
Owner Name and Address, Card Number, Expiration
Date, and Amount, and send card
information through:
- Above Address
- Fax at: 609 252 9698
- Phone at: 609 252 9099
|
|